Eberhardt, the Word Whore

After reading Eberhardt’s writings, I have been struck with the intense feeling that she really wasn’t one way or the other. She neither went native nor prostituted her writing to the French as a lackey of the colonizing effort of North Africa. Instead, she played a literary game, switching sides when it suited her interests, to quench her thirst for adventure, travel, and new experiences. No great morals held sway over her writing. She switched perspectives as easily as the French Foreign Legion would turn on their own indigenous troops.

At times, she wrote bubbly narratives of love between a Frenchman and a Berber girl. Other writings expressed her French patriotism, regardless of the fact that she wasn’t French. Yet others were simple descriptive sketches of places and people, neither leaning one way nor the other.

To travel, Eberhardt sold herself to whichever devil would take her the farthest into new and unexplored territory. At times it was the French; other times the Sufi brotherhood, yet other times, random clerics wandering the desert. Her pen was the means of funding her life. In the same way that many people work at jobs they dislike or even hate, she too would pick up disdainful writing gigs in order to travel further into the unknown.

Who is the real Eberhardt? That’s hard to say. I haven’t read her diary or journal. Even that collection of writing may very well be misleading. The truth will never really be known without a time machine and a mind probe. Being hounded by every government she came in contact with, she surely put up many defenses in her speech and writing. Even her thoughts were probably screened to assure nothing particularly damning would escape her lips or fingers. One scrap of paper declaring her undying love for the nomads and her distain for France would have ended her romanticized wanderings of the Magrib. She was too shrewd of a woman to allow that to occur.

Given the opportunity to travel far and wide in such remote and foreign territory in which few Europeans had ventured, I too would walk the fence between “going native” and being a lackey of Europe. It’s a dangerous game to play but the rewards of adventure and learning far outweigh the destruction of personal morals and professional credibility.

Eberhardt may have whored her words to both sides of the equation, but she didn’t compromise her one true passion – journeying into the unknown. Throughout her short life, she quenched her thirst for adventure – always walking to the top of the next mountain or dune to see what was on the other side – regardless of which camp she slept in at night. Being in a Sufi brotherhood and employed by the French as a war correspondent was a true stroke of genius on her part. She was welcomed almost everywhere – save for the guy with the machete that tried to split her in twain.

Dr Nelson’s Presentations

I attended two of Dr Nelson’s presentations. One over environmental sustainability which was given to the American students studying at ISLT and the other to a group of Tunisian engineering students at the MIT of Tunisia on ISO 14001 certification. The bodies of both presentations were very interesting both from a casual standpoint and engineering perspective. The most interesting thing to me was the responses from the students.

Before getting into the responses and questions from the two different audiences, I’ll go over the material in each presentation. The sustainability topic was very interesting. It focused on the disparity between living standards in the “developed” world with such countries as Japan and the United States representing the top economic dogs. The low countries on the wealth totem pole, or “developing/under developed” countries, included places such as Mali, China, and others. Through photos of “typical” families in each country, Dr Nelson demonstrated the difference in material possessions of a Mali family, surrounded by earthenware and organic products, and an American family surrounded by cars, TV’s, computers, plastics, and other non-sustainable possessions. The disparity between the American and Mali families was striking. From first blush, the Mali family leaves a much smaller impact on the planet.

Dr Nelson never really said one way or the other during the presentation if he thought that everyone should be brought up to the standard of America or down to the standard of Mali or somewhere in between. He touched on carrying capacities of the planet and resources available and waste streams and non-renewable resources (petroleum, minerals, etc), but he didn’t go in depth or get very technical. It was appropriate for the audience as I’m the only engineer and only one of two people in the class who appears to know anything about environmental science or environmental engineering practices. I liked how he brought up the point that up until now, and most likely as far into the future as humans exist, engineers will continue to innovate their way out of problems such as with the environment. He also presented us with the choice of doing it proactively or retroactively. He didn’t explicitly say which one was better, but it’s evident that the proactive approach is the best if for no other reason than economics.

Our class’s responses were anything but what I expected. Anne, Heather, and Giovanna proceeded to state their opinions on the topics he covered including such choice things as “don’t you agree that the planet has already reached its carrying capacity” and “how can we do all these things when people still don’t have clean water and children are starving” and others. Rather than asking questions to get meaningful answers, the three women tried to cram typical sound bytes and talking points put forth by some of the environmental organizations which would rather yell about how horrible everything is rather than come up with real workable solutions. I suppose that’s the difference between engineers and many other people. I see engineers as people who will figure out how to make everyone happy and for less money than they pay to not be happy. Some other people would rather complain and say the sky is falling instead of trying to reinforce the buttresses holding the sky in place.

All in all, I was very disappointed that we didn’t get a chance to ask real questions of Dr Nelson about his work and whatnot. Maybe next time.

The second presentation I attended by Dr Nelson was given to Tunisian engineering students at the top engineering college in Tunisia. The campus bears striking resemblance to CalPoly’s campus, right down to the plants and the proximity to the sea. The talk, over ISO 14001 certification, was very technical, giving a semi detailed overview of what’s entailed in an ISO 14001 certification process and the benefits for getting certified. Talking with the Tunisian students after the presentation, many of them didn’t really understand what Dr Nelson was talking about. He went fast and they didn’t have time to absorb the slides. In the future, it’d be helpful to at least give out a digital copy of the presentation.

There were several very good questions asked, such as “how does a small company do such a large certification process”. The answer is that CITET has a stripped down version of ISO 14001 designed specifically for small and medium sized businesses so that they can be environmentally friendly and be on the path to ISO 14001 long before they are required to do so by one of their customers. There were other good questions as well.

After the presentation, Kellen and I talked with the Tunisian students for a good 20 or 30 minutes. They all were asking questions about what we were studying, why we were in Tunisia, what we were going to do when we grew up, how they could move to the USA permanently, etc. It felt very good to be surrounded by such intelligent engineering students. These are definitely the best of the best in Tunisia.

All in all, I’m glad that I got to see two of Dr Nelson’s presentations in Tunisia. They both were informative and I was very interested to see the responses of the two different groups.